Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:37:28 -0700 > Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>usb-storage isn't very picky about the response at all... what exactly was >>happening without the patch? >> > > > usb-storage: *** thread awakened. > usb-storage: Command INQUIRY (6 bytes) > usb-storage: 12 00 00 00 24 00 > usb-storage: usb_stor_ctrl_transfer: rq=00 rqtype=21 value=0000 index=00 len=12 > usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 12/12 > usb-storage: -- transfer complete > usb-storage: Call to usb_stor_ctrl_transfer() returned 0 > usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 36 bytes > usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 36/36 > usb-storage: -- transfer complete > usb-storage: CBI data stage result is 0x0 > usb-storage: usb_stor_intr_transfer: xfer 2 bytes > usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 2/2 > usb-storage: -- transfer complete > usb-storage: Got interrupt data (0x28, 0x0) > usb-storage: CBI IRQ data showed reserved bType 40 > usb-storage: -- transport indicates error, resetting > usb-storage: usb_stor_CB_reset called > usb-storage: usb_stor_control_msg: rq=00 rqtype=21 value=0000 index=00 len=12 > usb-storage: Soft reset failed: -32 > >
I had the same problem with the Sony Clie NR70V Memory Stick ( http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 ) and this patch solved this issue. -- Arnaud Boudou ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
