Am Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 08:35 schrieb Vojtech Pavlik:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:08:40AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Hi Vojtech, hi list,
> >
> > could someone tell me why hid accepts devices with usage page 0xc as input
> > devices in this check from hid.h:
> > #define IS_INPUT_APPLICATION(a) (((a >= 0x00010000) && (a <= 0x00010008)) || (a ==
> > 0x00010080) || ( a == 0x000c0001))
>
> Too bad, I don't remember. Most likely there was such a device.
I have been notified that there are devices of this type which would
rather be accessed through hiddev. Reading the usage page specification
which calls such devices "application specific" I tend to concur and would
remove that test.
Isn't the one devicwe you had rather buggy and should be specialcased?
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
