Am Sonntag, 25. Januar 2004 02:38 schrieb Brad Hards:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:12 pm, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > I have been notified that there are devices of this type which would
> > > rather be accessed through hiddev. Reading the usage page specification
> > > which calls such devices "application specific" I tend to concur and
> > > would remove that test.
> > > Isn't the one devicwe you had rather buggy and should be specialcased?
> >
> > Possibly yes. Feel free to remove that check and see what breaks.
> It has been a while since I played with this, but I recall that it is the
> multimedia keys (which may be on a different interface) on some keyboards.
>
> So I think that removing this selection is a bad idea. If it is causing
> problems, you might be better off special casing those particular devices,
> rather than chasing keyboard vendor/product IDs, which is bound to be a
> losing battle....
How should this be done? We have to special case one of the cases
and how, if not by ids, could we do that?
Aren't keys who are advertising themselves in that way according to the
standard declaring themselves not to be keyboards? It seems to me that
such devices should use the system control usage of usage page 0x01.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
