On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:42:51AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 08:35 schrieb Vojtech Pavlik: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:08:40AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > Hi Vojtech, hi list, > > > > > > could someone tell me why hid accepts devices with usage page 0xc as input > > > devices in this check from hid.h: > > > #define IS_INPUT_APPLICATION(a) (((a >= 0x00010000) && (a <= 0x00010008)) || (a > > > == 0x00010080) || ( a == 0x000c0001)) > > > > Too bad, I don't remember. Most likely there was such a device. > > I have been notified that there are devices of this type which would > rather be accessed through hiddev. Reading the usage page specification > which calls such devices "application specific" I tend to concur and would > remove that test. > Isn't the one devicwe you had rather buggy and should be specialcased?
Possibly yes. Feel free to remove that check and see what breaks. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
