On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:54:31 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know Andrew wants implementations that talk bitmasks, > eventually, but that could be rolled in without changing > the API actually used by gadget drivers. I have an annoying habbit to overcomplexify things. Your patch looks more than enough for existing drivers; I was just thinking of hypotetical drivers, that could appear later, that could need some extra knowledge about endpoints in order to make the correct decision. Although the string parser is not as small as it could be if using bitmasks, and is not very resistant to endpoint names violating the rules, and relatively complex to be modified if new features would be added to endpoint naming conventions :) I'll try this patch as soon as my UDC driver will work (I see you already added support for it in your patch, thanks alot, although it doesn't work yet :-) -- Greetings, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
