On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 07:40:33PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > Your recent change to struct urb broke this function in the bluetooth > > driver. You know, I think usb_wait_for_urb() would make an excellent > > addition to usbcore. At some future time we could consider replacing > > synchronous unlink_urb with asynchronous unlink plus wait_for_urb. > > is the change from count to kref already in the current Linus kernel?
No, it's in the -mm tree only. It's pending for 2.6.7, so you don't have to worry about it just yet. > I think we should add the usb_wait_for_urb() for now, because I have to > use it in two driver now (hci_usb and bfusb) and so USB interna can be > changed without fixing the drivers. No, see my previous objections to this function (wrong, and broken.) Again, any reason why you can not just create a urb on the fly instead of insisting that it be embedded in your own structure? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
