On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:51:38PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > I think we should add the usb_wait_for_urb() for now, because I have to > > > use it in two driver now (hci_usb and bfusb) and so USB interna can be > > > changed without fixing the drivers. > > > > No, see my previous objections to this function (wrong, and broken.) > > > > Again, any reason why you can not just create a urb on the fly instead > > of insisting that it be embedded in your own structure? > > Embedding an URB in another structure is outright evil. It forces > struct urb to have a constant size which precludes any optimisation > done at allocation time.
Heh, now you understand my frustration with the bluetooth code :) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
