On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 03:49:24PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Granted that's so, it doesn't mean we need to use ->serialize.  And if we
> do, the parts of usbcore that could send messages to ep0 (probably just
> the usbfs and sysfs routines) will have to be changed to lock the device.

I don't know if this is similar, but I had problems with /proc/bus/usb/devices
causing errors on active devices on 2.4.  I'm using a device that's being
polled with a control message at about 100Hz, and the usb_string() calls
made by usb_dump_device_strings() aren't serializing with the ones being
made by the device's drivers, resulting in ENXIO errors from uhci_submit_urb.

My solution was to disable those string queries for that particular device; I
wish there was a way to get all of that information without sending messages
to devices.  (Just serializing it wouldn't be a good solution for me, since I
don't want to send unnecessary messages to the other device--it might
interrupt the flow of 100Hz polls.)

Ultimately what I'm doing is mapping USB pen drives to /etc/fstab mountpoints,
USB hub/port/level numbers, and getting fast insert/removal notification via
poll().   I'm getting this by parsing lsusb -v, /proc/bus/usb/devices,
/etc/fstab and /proc/scsi/usb-storage-#/#; most of the mapping between files
is via the serial number.  It's horribly roundabout ...

-- 
Glenn Maynard


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to