On Sun, 30 May 2004, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > Okay, so can we all agree on this one?
I don't know if it's really needed, but for consistency you might want to make a similar change around the call to usb_stor_Bulk_transport() near the start of isd200_invoke_transport() in isd200.c. Apart from that minor point, this looks okay to me. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
