On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Riccardo Persichetti wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> I've applied the patch you suggested me and tried different delays.
> The problem still occurs with values below 550. Starting from 600
> the error goes away and everything works as it should..
> Anyway, that delay doesn't hurt too much, so I'll keep my tree patched.
> Thanks a lot for your help, if you need some more testing I'd be happy
> to do them for you..
>
> Regards,
>
> riccardo
Something else you can try is to replace
udelay(600);
with
msleep(1);
This might help improve the responsiveness of your system while you access
the camera.
Alan Stern
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
