Yes I did try your modified printk's. I still got same results with wrong order.
E.g. a 11 10 a 11 10 -----Original Message----- From: okazaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 September 2004 12:47 To: Dominic Evans Subject: Re: isp1161 ISOC timeout problems Hi Dominic Evans. >In Troy Kisky's driver there is a comment: >//this chip (isp116x) gives a pulse of 167ns on the interrupt, pxa250 >requires 1000ns //so you must use level triggered for pxa250 or extra >hardware to extend the pulse I think it is important information.... If Intel XScale-PXA250 not support LEVEL trigger,you can not test it. >Just modifying the driver to use level triggered operation is not enough way. >set_GPIO_IRQ_edge(27, GPIO_FALLING_EDGE); irq = IRQ_GPIO(27); You & I know it's not setting of LEVEL trigger. Ting Wang (linux-usb-devel menber) trying this problem now,but I suggest way of LEVEL trigger now. I am considerring circuit of change LEVEL to TRIGGER signal for few days,wait momment. But it might not be satisfied too. There are severel member are trying isp1161 in ARM platform with you now. BY THE WAY you try it?(last mail advice) You will see these print on console. 11 a 11 a 11 a REPORT TO ME ( -_-) Adsynori ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id808&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
