On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 09:09:52PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Pete Zaitcev wrote: > >On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:35:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>What about a dependency of BLK_DEV_UB on USB_STORAGE=n ? > > > > > >I have them both as 'm' in my configuration, works like a charm. > > ub can work like that, but it makes it darned difficult to > use usb-storage like that. ub wants to bind to the devices, > not usb-storage, and if ub is unloaded, usb-storage doesn't > bind to them. at least that's been my experience with it.
Enabling CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB actually disables usb-storage from attaching to
certain devices, regardless of what's loaded or not.
I, personally, don't like this. But I wasn't consulted on that particular
feature. I'm given to understand that some bad things can happen when two
drivers can bind to the same device, but I haven't had time to experiment
with it.
I can tell you that this has turned into the single largest source of bug
reports/complaints about usb-storage. Something has to be done. I just
don't know what.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
C: They kicked your ass, didn't they?
S: They were cheating!
-- The Chief and Stef
User Friendly, 11/19/1997
pgp3ApCFThTtP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
