On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Its not that they just enable it. Its that it has side effects. I enable it > to support > one device - it then 'devnaps' other devices that usbstorage supports _much_ > better. Is there some way it could work in reverse. eg. let ub bind only if > usbstorage does not, possibly making usbstorage a _little_ more conservative > if ub is present?
Unfortunately there isn't any way to define which driver should bind to a device, if they are both capable of controlling it. Maybe there should be. It might not be too hard to add a sysfs interface for that sort of thing. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
