> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Dag Nygren wrote: > It's safe to assume the sticky was faulty all along -- since nobody can > possibly prove the assumption is wrong! As for the other three sticks... > Who knows? But I wouldn't recommend that brand to anybody.
Well, the other 3 failing ones were different brand sticks, but we never tested them anywhere else than in the embedded part. The failing ones were: - Fujitsu Siemens Memorybird PQ-T64, USB 2.0, Rev1.0 - Transcend JetFlash 512MB - Kingston USB drive 256 MB, Rev. 1.12 - And another Kingston I didn't make a notice of. But I am starting to think we really got the junkyard from the company we borrowed them from. > I've never had any problems with my Memorex flash device. I now bought three different ones: - One Kingston - One Hama - One "something" very cheap And they all work perfectly fine!!! I am sorry for wasting your time, but the SCSI-patch really make me feel better about this device. The final application will be part of a big system and the users are supposed to regard it as a USB-reader, meaning that they will stick any stick they can find in it and a crash would then not be acceptable. As all the newly bought sticks now seems to be working I will move on to other smaller problems in the thing. Thanks again very much for your help. Dag ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
