On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Christopher Montgomery wrote: > > If you look more closely at what's really happening, you should find that > > it all makes sense. You can't get -EPROTO status in URBs for devices that > > the kernel knows are disconnected, because the core won't even accept > > these URBs when they are submitted. Also, khubd is a single thread so it > > can do only one thing at a time. If it's busy with disconnect processing > > for one device, it can't suddenly start doing disconnect processing for a > > different device. > > I didn't say I couldn't figure out what was happening, I said it was > suboptimal, and wanted to know if anyone realized this was happening. > The answer appears to be, "No, it's not intentional, yes we know it's > happening, a 'fix' is more pain than would be justified', correct?
Ummm... I've lost track of the original question. What is suboptimal and would be painful to fix? Alan Stern Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
