Hi, Am Samstag, 4. November 2006 23:12 schrieb David Brownell: > If you associate those with e.g. interface #0 then only your kernel > driver will be able to issue those control requests though ... the > point being not to use the _unrestricted_ request types, instead > use USB_RECIP_INTERFACE in the bRequestType field.
Ok, i now basically got two different advises: - Use restricted control transfers - Use interrupt transfers The latter has the disadvantage to not reliably work with 2.4 kernels i have been told here. As i am not a usb guru i'd prefer an answer from you guys: What's the nicer way to do this? INT transfers or restricted control transfers? I don't need performance, the control transfers are just fine for me. It'd be nice if i could still provide a libusb based demo app for those people who want to use my interface directly wirhout the kernels i2c framwork. What's the way to go? I am really sorry to bother you, but it's imho nicer to have a clean interface that the gurus here would consider "ok" than something that has some flaws just because i didn't ask. Till ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
