On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:26:15 +0200, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > The main problem is that the URB does not have an s/g list. If it
> > did, the whole library would be unnecessary. Nonetheless, we still
> 
> And that from the man who complained about 24 more bytes in struct urb ;-)

I think your irony falls flat. Why do you think I haven't submitted
a patch to add it yet? Of course there's always a tradeoff and linear
URBs served us well so far. I am merely stating the reason why the
library exists.

-- Pete

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to