Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:26:15 +0200, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The main problem is that the URB does not have an s/g list. If it
> > > did, the whole library would be unnecessary. Nonetheless, we still
> >
> > And that from the man who complained about 24 more bytes in struct urb ;-)
>
> I think your irony falls flat. Why do you think I haven't submitted
> a patch to add it yet? Of course there's always a tradeoff and linear
> URBs served us well so far. I am merely stating the reason why the
> library exists.
But it hasn't. It can do a lot of things nobody needs and can't do
things like scatter/gather that are needed. It allocates a lot of memory
in every submission. It is too large because of unneeded features.
It works, it doesn't work well.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
