Calm down. We should discuss this problem in a rational way. I believe there should be more stories behind this mail. Even though I am not quite clear about what happened before, but I guess probably you argued on this some time back. So what are the current status?
Regards Jason Xiao On 6/20/07, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 schrieb Pete Zaitcev: > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:26:15 +0200, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The main problem is that the URB does not have an s/g list. If it > > > > did, the whole library would be unnecessary. Nonetheless, we still > > > > > > And that from the man who complained about 24 more bytes in struct urb ;-) > > > > I think your irony falls flat. Why do you think I haven't submitted > > a patch to add it yet? Of course there's always a tradeoff and linear > > URBs served us well so far. I am merely stating the reason why the > > library exists. > > But it hasn't. It can do a lot of things nobody needs and can't do > things like scatter/gather that are needed. It allocates a lot of memory > in every submission. It is too large because of unneeded features. > It works, it doesn't work well. > > Regards > Oliver > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
