Matthew Dharm wrote: > > What's wrong with this? We need to hold the spinlock to prevent the > disconnect function from proceeding while we are using the device. If you want to protect against the disconnect thread, you need a semaphore, not a spinlock. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [linux-usb] USB storage race still there Pavel Machek
- [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still there Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still the... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage r... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still the... Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage r... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Matthew Dharm
