Pavel Machek wrote: > Thomas, is even semaphore neccessary? As I see it, disconnect can only > be called when we block, and re-checking pointers after each blocking > operation seems easy enough. This is enough on UP, sure... But don't we need to protect ourselves from the disconnect running concurrently on another processor in an SMP machine? Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [linux-usb] USB storage race still there Pavel Machek
- [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still there Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still the... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage r... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still the... Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race still... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage r... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb] Re: USB storage race s... Matthew Dharm
