BCL are currently tring to source me an Actiontec or IBM:
http://www.actiontec.com/products/modems/cwi/cwi_overview.html
http://www5.pc.ibm.com/us/products.nsf/$wwwPartNumLookup/_33L4618
I will let you know how they get on.

Cheers All,
Chris Bayley

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Hellyar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 17:52
> To: 'Volker Kuhlmann'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: internal PCI 56k real modem
> 
> 
> Slipstream computers can probably get you one...
> 
> Email him at "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and see what he can do for you..
> 
> </gratuitous plug for friends business>  :-).
> 
> Cheers,  Chris Hellyar.
> 
> Selwyn District Council
> Phones: X 831 (03)324 5831 (021) 350 603
> <This message has not been inspected by the Chief Censors office>
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Volker Kuhlmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2001 16:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: internal PCI 56k real modem
> 
> 
> > Dial-up is not future proof - full stop.
> 
> I would disagree. At least it's good as a backup for ADSL.  56k is
> $20/month, ADSL is at least 3 times that. For browsing occasionally and
> sending a few emails ADSL is simply stupid, and that's what my friend
> will be doing.
> 
> Also, 56k is very reliable. ADSL is not. Read the adsl list.
> 
> > Cable modems and dsl modems plug into your nc, don't they?
> 
> Yes, but see above.
> 
> > By the time you upgrade to a motherboard that doesn't support
> > ISA
> 
> The available ISA slots (1?) may fill up too fast...
> 
> 
> But coming back to the real issue, can anyone suggest any retailers of
> PCI modems?
> 
> (Thanks to Philip Charles for suggesting one in Dunedin)
> 
> Volker
> 
> ######################################################################
> The  contents  of  this  e-mail  message  may   be  privileged  and/or
> confidential. If you are not the  intended recipient please delete the
> message and notify the sender. 
> 
> Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author, and do
> not necessarily represent the official  position of the Selwyn District 
> Council
> ######################################################################
> 

Reply via email to