Sorry can't get on the roof to check but mine is a grid-dish, about 1m 
wide 500mm high on a 2m mast mounted at roof apex.  A little larger and 
less conspicuous than a Sky dish.

Adrian

Gavin Treadgold wrote:

> I have just had a couple of phone calls from the CCC, and whilst they say
> that the size shouldn't be a problem (primarily concerned with height, and
> size of aerial/dish), I should sketch out something and fax it through to
> one of the planners to get a better idea. Has anyone got dimensions and
> suitable mounting instructions that I could use to describe the setup?
> 
> Cheers Gav
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Richard Smart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:00
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: RE: 802.11 and distributing Linux around chch
>>
>>
>>The bylaws are tied up with resource consents and apply to ALL
>>antennas with greater than a certain radiation field density. The
>>Christchurch laws use a more stringent set of levels than the
>>national ones - which makes the resource consents (much) harder to get !!
>>
>>The building consents (which are conditional on resource
>>consents) are more concerned with size, mounting etc etc etc
>>
>>BTW - the radiation level limits were in place well before ADSL
>>rollouts started  :-)
>>
>>Richard Smart
>>
>>>>>Chris Hellyar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/14 11:36  >>>
>>>>>
>>'Urro..
>>
>>$350 for an 802.11 card, about $800 for a high gain base antenna.
>> You could
>>get away without the base antenna if you only wanted 50-100m coverage
>>though.
>>
>>If the CHCH by-laws are the same as ours you'd not need a resource consent
>>or planning permission assuming the aerial didn't obscure
>>anyone's view, or
>>sit more than 3 feet above the peak of the roof of your house.
>>
>>Cheers,  Chris Hellyar.
>>
>>Selwyn District Council
>>Phones: X 831 (03)324 5831 (021) 350 603
>><This message has not been inspected by the Chief Censors office>
>>
>>
> 
> 


Reply via email to