On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:44:53PM +1300, Helmut Walle wrote:
> > > So why not generate PS directly without the LaTeX detour?!
> > that, i'd like to see...
> Here you are: http://hwalle.orcon.net.nz/soft/address2ps.html
thanks...
> > LaTeX vs ps is like c vs assembler i think ;-)
> Well, IMHO this comparison is not quite fair.
#
yes, i know, couldn' think of a better one. sorry.
maybe shell-script vs c.
LaTeX and shellscripts allowing very complex commands in simple
statements while ps and c are generic programming languages.
not many people use c for what can be done in a quick script.
greetings, martin.
--
interested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen training,
sTeam/caudium/roxen and/or unix system administration anywhere in the world.
--
pike programmer working in europe csl-gmbh.net
open-steam.org (www.archlab|(www|db).hb2).tuwien.ac.at
unix bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at
systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.(schon.org|root.at)
Martin B�hr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
