Thank you for that Jim, well explained. I think I understand better now :-)
Thanks to others who contributed too, Mike, Helmut. =)

I somehow overlooked that DSL definitely != ethernet. doh *whacks forehead*

One more question, if I may - I thought bridges were switched (at the ethernet 
layer). You imply that a bridge is simply a 2 port hub (and can be switched 
or unswitched/broadcast, depending on complexity). I got the idea somewhere 
that a bridge's intended function was different from a hub...
ie. hub -> join end terminals together
bridge -> join networks together
Now I think about it for a couple of seconds, the actual functionality is 
pretty much identical, no? So... is then "hub" just another word for "bridge" 
(ie. they are essentially the same device) ?

Cheers,
Gareth

ps. still not sure I "get" NAT (isn't it supposed to save address space? how's 
that, if it's 1-to-1 direct mapped..?) ... but I'll google for that one :-)



Reply via email to