Yes it does run on Linux. Specs say RedHat 7.2 but there is a Christchurch
company with RedHat 8.0 and reportedly works fine.

It is fairly demanding on hardware though - like .5Gb ram suggested.

Robert

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Wednesday, 26 March 2003 02:04 p.m.
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: IntraNet

spammer spammer!!
LOL does it run on linux Robert?
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:56:31 +1200
"Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Xerox Docushare will do everything you want.
> 
> Robert
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Peter van Hout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2003 01:50 p.m.
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: IntraNet
> 
> The policies and procedures are written in word so could be saved at
> html.  One or two intranets I have seen allow users to save a link to
> the document in a database so you may have fields in a database that
> record things like title, description, code, category and url...that
> type of stuff...and therefore it's a little more complex than having a
> simple list of documents you click into.
> 
> peter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2003 12:59 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IntraNet
> 
> 
> what format are the policies and procedures in? I assume they have been
> written - if so, convert them to html and stick them in apache.
> 
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:22:14 +1200
> Peter van Hout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Simple question no doubt but I'll ask it anyway.
> > 
> > I have a RedHat Server setup and want an IntraNet for the staff in the
> 
> > office.  Its main purpose is to centralise policies, procedures, etc 
> > so that staff can access them (given that they have the right to 
> > access
> > them) but also store other 'head office' type information.
> > 
> > Does anyone have an example of one that I can use and modify?
> > 
> > Peter van Hout
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

Reply via email to