Sorry Robert but I stand by the *all* If there is no structure created, maintained, and enforced then the documentation structure falls into a mess.
It doesn't matter how flash the system is if the user has to do *any* extra effort in order to arrange their published documents then they won't. Instead you need a designated person to maintain the library. OK you just put everything into a flat arrangement and hook it up to a search engine ala HTDig but this can also present problems along the lines of identification of key words especially as the repository starts to get any size. We looked at Docushare and I think it is going to be implemented but I have at every opportunity fought it because the 6 figure licencing I believed to be undefensible. And I also believe most proprietary software to be bad by definition. On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 11:32, Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote: > I respectfully disagree with your use of the "all" word. > > He says (trying not to sound like a salesman) - the Xerox solution is > managed by the users. > > Robert > > -----Original Message----- > From: Zane Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2003 11:08 a.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IntraNet > > I had a look at WebGUI > http://www.plainblack.com/webgui > > But I haven't actually tried to use it live. > > With all doc management you need to have a person who looks after the > "library" other wise it just becomes useless. -- Zane Gilmore, Analyst / Programmer Information Services Section, Information Technology Dept, University of Canterbury - Te Whare Waananga o Waitaha Private Bag 4800, Christchurch New Zealand Phone +64-3-364 2987 extn 7895
