-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Bryce Stenberg wrote:
> Ok, not having much luck here. > I tried 'mt-st' but still not found. When you say (Nick) the package name > is 'mt-st' does that also mean the executable is 'mt-st'? Should be called "mt", /bin/mt on Debian at least. You may need to install a package called "mt-st", which on Debian you'd use `apt-get install mt-st`, which will install a bunch of things (among them being /bin/mt) > (On a side note, is there any significance to files being located in the > directory /sbin as opposed to /usr/bin - they both seem to hold executable > files?) The distinction between "bin" and "sbin" is that sbin is typically reserved for binaries which require root. The distinction between "/bin" or "/sbin", and "/usr/bin" or "/usr/sbin" is that the former are considered to be boot critical, the latter are not. "/usr/local/bin", "/usr/local/sbin" are usually non-package managed or "locally" installed binaries. Hope this helps :) - -- David Zanetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | (__) #include <geek/unix.h> | ( oo Mooooooo "Hope.. is a dangerous thing." | /(_O ./ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD4DBQE+ihO3T21+qRy4P+QRAiS3AJjacXonduAPD9ckBsF3ArsCjQZdAKDQ1zc5 ZfBt9Lz7429VYqHRCkUYbw== =ZhzI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
