I disagree. What if I say:
*Disclaimer* - These products are not boxed OEM versions but are burned to order from freely downloadable versions. As such, they do not come with written documentation of any kind, nor is any warranty expressed or implied. While every effort is made to ensure a quality product, use of these products is strictly at your own risk.


That is not going to please RedHat one iota, because I still refer to it as "RedHat 9."
This is even if I state on my site:
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds and all trademarks belong to their respective rights holders.


Regards,

Jason
PS, I think RH are being Draconian about this. The corporates will buy the distro. The home/personal users should be able to download/buy copies for evaluation so they can espouse the benefits to thos coporates. The reality is that if RH persist like this they will hurt their own goodwill and other distro's who don't, won't. Score the other distro's one, RH, nil.
Guy Steven wrote:


For all they know, the cd's distributed under the name RedHat may have
content that differs from the official RedHat distributions. Someone could
download Redhat 9, make some minor changes and redistribute it, still under
the name RedHat. The resultant distribution may be a load of sh#t. (this is
not an invitation for people to say that the orignial rh 9 is anyway).
Redhat have a legitimate right to control what software is distributed under
their name.








Reply via email to