Brad wrote: > Ah, that's a good idea. I also just found tcpbalance > (http://www.snookles.com/erlang/tcpbalance/), > a tcp proxy > aimed at distcc specifically.
Hmm. That looks like the way to go. It's a shame there is no ebuild for tcpbalance. There is one for Erlang though (The language it was written in). > I'd say we run with the auto-balancing (was it tested at the > dry run?) but keep an eye on machine balance, if things are > badly out of whack the manual method may be better. We haven't tested any load balancing yet. We can give it a go on the day and if it is no good, then do it manually. Later David Kirk
