I _think_ the 169.254 network is a default one given when an interface cannot get its address via dhcp.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:09:20+1200 mjm159<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On an aside, I also can't understand why 169.254.0.0 keeps appearing > in my route table. None of the interfaces are configured to receive > an address via DHCP so why should that private network appear out of > nowhere?
