On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 14:35, you wrote: > On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:53:58 +1200 > Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > chris > thanks for the source extract which, returning to my original point, > clearly shows that pacific/auckland is a distinctly different *location* to > that of nz. using the rule of thumb which seems to be operating here i > assume it'd be ok for londoners to choose any of those locations which are > running on GMT as their timezone - because it worked?
As long as it's not North of the Watford Gap. -- Sincerely etc., Christopher Sawtell
