On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 22:53:15 +1200
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 17:52, you wrote:
> > see also here:
> >
> > http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm
> >
> > quote:
> >
> > "Locations are identified by continent or ocean and then by the name
> > of the location, which is typically the largest city within the
> > region."
> >
> > supports the argument thet "Pacific/Auckland" is correct, as opposed
> > to"NZ"
> Indeed it does.
> Pacific/Auckland has always worked for me too, but I've never tried
> plain old NZ. Looking at the australasia file it seems to me, a total
> neophyte in the matter of Unix time, that there is now no difference
> between the two.
> 
> NZ time has all the historical vagaries of NZ daylight savings time
> recorded, whereas Pacific/Auckland does not. Anyway as I said before
> it's all a bit moot.
> 
> For the public record I loath and detest the so called "summer time".
> It's absence was one of the attractions of coming here in the late
> 60s.

LOL, all that sunshine rots your curtains huh Chris? (that was one of
the common complaints when it was first introduced here).

> 
> -- 
> Sincerely etc.,
> Christopher Sawtell
> 
> 


Reply via email to