Is this the answer to my own question?.... cd /usr/src ln -s linux-2.6.0/ linux
or similar? Rob -----Original Message----- From: Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) Sent: Monday, 22 December 2003 12:34 p.m. To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Kernel 2.6.0 suspiciously easy Nick, I found this in the Gentoo Forums.... Symlinks: Symlinks are necessary for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Create two symlinks for the 2.6 kernel that you will use: (1) /usr/src/linux and (2) /usr/src/linux-beta. These symlinks are sometimes depended upon by certain packages/ebuilds to determine which kernel to compile against such as nvidia-kernel/glx. The symlinks are basically used as a systemwide indication of which kernel sources are currently in use so are recommended. My question is; Did you have to create the symlinks? (Also for a dummy like me, if you did, how?) Robert What Do Fish Say When They Hit a Concrete Wall? Dam! -----Original Message----- From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 22 December 2003 12:14 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Kernel 2.6.0 suspiciously easy emerged the source, went through and chose what config options to include (that was the hardest part, may need tweaking), make, make modules_install, copy the kernel to /boot, reboot, emerge nividia-dev and nvidia-kernel, every damn thing seems to be working. networking must be or i couldn't send this! sound is working (alsa now included in the kernel source - sweet). Is 80-100 fps in tuxracer on an athlon 1133 with a GeForce2 MX/MX 400 ok? There must be something wrong with this Torvalds guy, doesn't he know .0 releases aren't supposed to work?
