Wow, that's weird that it did not automagically configure your Internet Con (DHCP) for you. It did for me as I have the same setup here.

It is a sweet looking desktop and seems to be stable as heck so far (from my limited playtime with it). I would say that if you are happy with it, leave it as it sounds as though it is now configured how you want it and I guess you can apt-get/upgrade anything you may want at a later stage. I particularly liked Synaptic which I had never used before...

Cheers

Jason
PS, new to Debian so take my ravings re it with a grain of salt.

Andrew Errington wrote:
Well, thanks Jason, for burning a copy for me so quickly. I booted the ThinkPad with the Live CD (disc 1), and it booted up into KDE quite nicely. There were two problems I immediately noticed:

1) Although the PCMCIA subsystem was detected, and the ethernet/modem combo card therein was found, I had to type 'pump' manually to get it to configure (I have a DHCP server in my router). I would expect this to happen automatically.
2) The (known) tricky sound on the 600E did not work, but the single line modprobe-with-arguments that is the simple solution also worked.


So, I have a dilemma- do I keep Debian woody on the laptop, with kernel 2.4.18, and an old KDE, which all mostly works even though I haven't tweaked it yet, or do I install MEPIS, which is a later kernel, later KDE and has a bunch of other apps neatly packages (oh, and it *looks* *nice*)?

I am sure to get a range of comments to help me decide- fire away! (Sorry Jason, you can't give me MEPIS and then tell me to install Mandrake...)

Thanks,

Andy

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:09, you wrote:

I am not sure, have a look at mepis.org for more info. I have the latest
version (2-10-03). I think it is a 'combination' but of course you can
apt-get (or Synaptic) anything and it comes pre-configured to get
software from several repositores and you can specify whether to include
stable/unstable etc. They have included a GUI Control Centre for
handling most tasks, which is cool.

Cheers

Jason

Andrew Errington wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:44, you wrote:

Hi All,

Well after the hell that was the first Debian (standard, text based)
installation I tried, I just experienced pure joy with MEPIS Linux. It
is a Debian based Distro (I have been wanting to toy with Debian on a
spare partition for some time now) that is very easy to install.

Hi,


I just put Debian 3.0 (woody) on my laptop (IBM ThinkPad 600E).  I
don't think the installer is so bad, but you do have to concentrate.  I
will post to the list my final choice of partitions (since this is the
decision I had the most difficulty with).

Anyway, my question for you is- with MEPIS do you end up with a
'standard' installation (i.e. completely 'stable' packages) or do you
get a happy combination of stable, testing and unstable?  Since I only
put Debian on at the weekend I am willing to discard it and try
something new if it is better.  My only worry is keeping it up to date,
since this is easy with the staid and stolid Debian woody, but a little
more involved with Knoppix and its ilk.

Of course I will RTF-MEPIS-M, but that is no substitute for hearing
someone's experience related.

Andy

PS The Debian installation went very smoothly.  Everything but sound
worked out of the box, and a quick Google showed an easy
order-of-execution solution.  My advice- write down all the hardware
settings reported by Windows device manager before reformatting.



Reply via email to