On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:36, Patrick Dunford wrote:The reason why cost saving is not a big deal is that most people I know in church circles aren't that tight.
Linux will give most people a cost saving. That has been justified to you a number of times in this thread. If you can't see it think again. Either you pay licensing fees (be they minimal or substantial) or you don't. With MS products you do, with the equivalent open source products, for the job we are discussing, you don't pay. full stop.
Nick Rout wrote:
- Re: Church opensource. Michael Pearce
- RE: Church opensource. Don Gould
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- RE: Church opensource. Don Gould
- RE: "Everyone" uses it Was:Church opens... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Church opensource. Nick Rout
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensource. Nick Rout
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensource. Nick Rout
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensource. Jim Cheetham
- Re: Church opensource. anton
- Re: Church opensource. Yuri de Groot
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensource. Yuri de Groot
- Re: Church opensource. Carl Cerecke
- RE: Church opensource. Getting OT here..... Steve Bell
- Re: Church opensource. Getting OT here..... Yuri de Groot
- Re: Church opensource. Patrick Dunford
- Re: Church opensource. Philip Charles
