On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:56:15 +1300, you wrote:

>On Monday 08 March 2004 16:56, you wrote:
>> On Monday 08 March 2004 15:14, Zane Gilmore wrote:
>> Thats really intresting. I did not know that.
>>
>> > Steve Holdoway wrote:
>> > > Sorry,
>> > >
>> > > I've started a new thread in my mail reader (:
>> >
>> > If you hit the "reply to:" then you *didn't* start a new thread.
>> > Even if you did then change the subject line.
>> > That called "hijacking the thread" or threadjacking and changing the
>> > subject line doesn't change the "In-reply-to:" header.
>> >
>> > If you don't like typing in the address for a new list message then put
>> > it in your address book.
>
>Some of us don't like using address books as they are generally a pain to
>keep up to date and complete, it is much easier just to click reply.
>But to keep everyone happy we could instead just copy the address or clicking 
>on the address using kmail starts up a new window and presumably a new thread.

The bottom line is that I was having terrible problems with ihug
emails, both in and out never arriving, and I was looking for
information from other ihug users, to see if they were having the same
problem.

I use forte agent as my mail reader, and it said that I had started a
new thread. I'll send anyone a screenshot proving it. Maybe they've (
ie Forte, not other subscribers! ) got a problem...?

Interestingly, not one person replied on topic. 

Steve

Reply via email to