I have been using Ihug for over 5 years now and never had the problems that you describe.
Have you tried using a different email client? Forte? That sounds Java-ish. On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 20:35, Steve Holdoway wrote: > On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:56:15 +1300, you wrote: > > >On Monday 08 March 2004 16:56, you wrote: > >> On Monday 08 March 2004 15:14, Zane Gilmore wrote: > >> Thats really intresting. I did not know that. > >> > >> > Steve Holdoway wrote: > >> > > Sorry, > >> > > > >> > > I've started a new thread in my mail reader (: > >> > > >> > If you hit the "reply to:" then you *didn't* start a new thread. > >> > Even if you did then change the subject line. > >> > That called "hijacking the thread" or threadjacking and changing the > >> > subject line doesn't change the "In-reply-to:" header. > >> > > >> > If you don't like typing in the address for a new list message then put > >> > it in your address book. > > > >Some of us don't like using address books as they are generally a pain to > >keep up to date and complete, it is much easier just to click reply. > >But to keep everyone happy we could instead just copy the address or clicking > >on the address using kmail starts up a new window and presumably a new thread. > > The bottom line is that I was having terrible problems with ihug > emails, both in and out never arriving, and I was looking for > information from other ihug users, to see if they were having the same > problem. > > I use forte agent as my mail reader, and it said that I had started a > new thread. I'll send anyone a screenshot proving it. Maybe they've ( > ie Forte, not other subscribers! ) got a problem...? > > Interestingly, not one person replied on topic. > > Steve -- ---------------------------------------------------- Regards, Zane Gilmore (Linux nerd since 1998) ____________________________________________________ Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.:- A.C.Clark ____________________________________________________
