It's a free world (well, kind of), free software and a free list. AND MANY here disagree with you, in fact, I think MOST do. So, democratically speaking, sit down and be quiet now please...
</end rant>
Cheers
Jason
Matthew Gregan wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:07:43PM +1200, Jason Greenwood wrote:
In relation to Post [0], I HOPE everyone can see the relevance of that one! The reason I had posted it is because there had been discussion on list prior to this about hardware based MP3 Players that support .ogg (HELLO, it's an open format!). I had told the list at that time that if/when we got any, I would let them know - which is what I subsequently did.
"The list" doesn't care. It may have been that particular people on the list wanted to know about these devices. Fine. Contact them off list.
Would these sorts of commercial posts still be acceptable in your eyes if it was not one, but five, fifty, or five hundred commercial vendors posting similar advertisements? How about if each of these vendors posted commercial stuff every time you/your business did?
Now, if you were new to the list or do not read all posts, then my 'commercial post' may have seemed innapropriate. However, for long time list members it should/would have been viewed as totally appropriate. There can be no hard and fast rules when it comes to 'netiquette' generally - one has to use common sense, which I try to do. I will continue to post as I feel appropriate and if I get kicked off the list for it, well, then so be it.
I'm not new to the list. I read a farily large proportion of posts. That message, and many (but not all) of your commercial plugs are inappropriate for a list where most of the subscribers are helping each other without expecting to financially profit from their fellow posters.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 06:04:12PM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
hear hear, I too recall that the so called commercial spam was a follow up to an earlier thread (maybe the post should have made that clearer)
I'm not sure where the term 'spam' came from in this discussion. The particular message I referenced may have been a follow up to a previous thread, but it was clearly commercial, and just one of many[0]. And consider this: the message was not solicted by every user of the list, nor even the majority.
[0] http://lists.ethernal.org/cantlug-0403/msg00594.html
-mjg
