On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 16:17, Jim Cheetham wrote: > I've been thinking about the CLUG wiki, and decided that I should have > made a decision about the licensing model before anyone contributed. I > think the examples of others has convinced me that the CC license is > appropriate, however I haven't actually done any real research on the > alternatives. > > Can I have some opinions, please? Wikipedia uses the GFDL, FWIW. I suggest others look at the alternatives at Creative Commons to see what suits there taste ;) -- Michael JasonSmith http://www.ldots.org/
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Carl Cerecke
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions InfoHelp
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Andrew Turner
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Hugo Vincent
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Jim Cheetham
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Nick Rout
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Michael JasonSmith
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Jim Cheetham
- Re: GNU-less linux distributions Michael JasonSmith
- Documentation licenses Re: GNU-less li... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Michael JasonSmith
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Douglas Royds
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Douglas Royds
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Michael JasonSmith
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Michael JasonSmith
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Douglas Royds
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Jim Cheetham
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Michael JasonSmith
- Re: Documentation licenses Re: GN... Douglas Royds
