courier is working very well here, with this setup:

postfix->procmail->maildir->courier-imap

fetchmail also bolts on the front of postfix for a few pop accounts i
have about the place (legacy of too many isp accounts)




On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:32:55 +1200
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jim Cheetham wrote:
> 
> > Jamie Dobbs wrote:
> >
> >>> Don't use .forward to redirect to .procmail, remove the .forward file
> >>> and exim will go straight to .procmail (assuming you're still default).
> >>
> >> I tried this an couldn't get it to work that is why I ended up having to
> >> use the .forward file
> >
> >
> > Without seeing your exim.conf file I can't really say wht it didn't 
> > work. If you're taking the time to build a mailserver from scratch, 
> > it's a good goal to also try to understand *everything* present in the 
> > conf file (although not everything that *could* appear!). Exim's 
> > online docs are comprehensive, and there are books too. I have one ...
> >
> >>> Possibly don't trust probmail to deliver into maildir files. Early
> >>> versions were not well implemented, and I'm not sure that this has
> >>> changed. Safecat will do the job nicely.
> >>
> >>
> >> I've had a Gentoo box running as a mail server using procmail/maildir 
> >> for
> >> about a year with no issues so far so thought I should be able to do the
> >> same thing udner Debian.
> >> What is 'safecat' and what does it do?
> >
> >
> > Well, I'm sure the procmail people have done their best to make 
> > Maildir delivery safe by now :-) It's just that the original Maildir 
> > implementors (djb for the algorithm, that should tell you something) 
> > have astronomically high standards, and can find reason to complain 
> > about virtually any code except their own.
> >
> > Safecat accepts a message on stdin, and a description of where the 
> > message is to go as arguments. It then guarantees to have the message 
> > places into the right place in the message store, atomically, before 
> > terminating. Failure is not an option :-) Failure might result in 
> > temporary files existing outside the message store, but not within it. 
> > Belt and braces. Overkill? Perhaps. It's also general-purpose enough 
> > to use in a .forward file to write directly into a Maildir, bypassing 
> > procmail entirely.
> >
> > Mind you, procmail is advised for other reasons :-) Volker will be 
> > doing a presentation on procmail in September. I'll be talking about 
> > mail in general ... 
> > http://clug.inode.co.nz/index.php/20040923presentation
> >
> > -jim
> >
> >
> I'd say that if you really want to understand what's going on, then 
> sendmail's the only way to go. It's also the safest ( not my words, but 
> those of the top internet security techie at British Telecom ( sorry 
> Syntegra ) ).
> 
> I'm playing at getting courier up at the moment, just to play with IMAP 
> again. However, it's still in Beta, and has been for years.
> 
> Steve

-- 
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to