oh and the joy of procmail is that you can bolt spamassassin and other
content examiners in as well.

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:35:52 +1200
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> courier is working very well here, with this setup:
> 
> postfix->procmail->maildir->courier-imap
> 
> fetchmail also bolts on the front of postfix for a few pop accounts i
> have about the place (legacy of too many isp accounts)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:32:55 +1200
> Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Jim Cheetham wrote:
> > 
> > > Jamie Dobbs wrote:
> > >
> > >>> Don't use .forward to redirect to .procmail, remove the .forward file
> > >>> and exim will go straight to .procmail (assuming you're still default).
> > >>
> > >> I tried this an couldn't get it to work that is why I ended up having to
> > >> use the .forward file
> > >
> > >
> > > Without seeing your exim.conf file I can't really say wht it didn't 
> > > work. If you're taking the time to build a mailserver from scratch, 
> > > it's a good goal to also try to understand *everything* present in the 
> > > conf file (although not everything that *could* appear!). Exim's 
> > > online docs are comprehensive, and there are books too. I have one ...
> > >
> > >>> Possibly don't trust probmail to deliver into maildir files. Early
> > >>> versions were not well implemented, and I'm not sure that this has
> > >>> changed. Safecat will do the job nicely.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I've had a Gentoo box running as a mail server using procmail/maildir 
> > >> for
> > >> about a year with no issues so far so thought I should be able to do the
> > >> same thing udner Debian.
> > >> What is 'safecat' and what does it do?
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, I'm sure the procmail people have done their best to make 
> > > Maildir delivery safe by now :-) It's just that the original Maildir 
> > > implementors (djb for the algorithm, that should tell you something) 
> > > have astronomically high standards, and can find reason to complain 
> > > about virtually any code except their own.
> > >
> > > Safecat accepts a message on stdin, and a description of where the 
> > > message is to go as arguments. It then guarantees to have the message 
> > > places into the right place in the message store, atomically, before 
> > > terminating. Failure is not an option :-) Failure might result in 
> > > temporary files existing outside the message store, but not within it. 
> > > Belt and braces. Overkill? Perhaps. It's also general-purpose enough 
> > > to use in a .forward file to write directly into a Maildir, bypassing 
> > > procmail entirely.
> > >
> > > Mind you, procmail is advised for other reasons :-) Volker will be 
> > > doing a presentation on procmail in September. I'll be talking about 
> > > mail in general ... 
> > > http://clug.inode.co.nz/index.php/20040923presentation
> > >
> > > -jim
> > >
> > >
> > I'd say that if you really want to understand what's going on, then 
> > sendmail's the only way to go. It's also the safest ( not my words, but 
> > those of the top internet security techie at British Telecom ( sorry 
> > Syntegra ) ).
> > 
> > I'm playing at getting courier up at the moment, just to play with IMAP 
> > again. However, it's still in Beta, and has been for years.
> > 
> > Steve
> 
> -- 
> Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to