Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:05, Douglas Royds wrote:
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
The current plan is to have an AGM type meeting to decide whether we wish
to move to St. Albans for our meetings,
This could potentially be decided on-list - a simple for-and-against
postings thread.
Indeed it could, but then many people would not view the premises and would
not be able to make a fully informed decision.
Very true.
and to elect a bunch of suckers^H^H^H^H
a group of esteemed members to be your committee.
Is the CLUG to have a committee now?
It has done for about 18 Months or so.
You might not have heard about it simply because "The CLUG does not exist" &
it's not possible for a committee to exist for an entity which does not. :-)
Currently the elected members are:-
Nick Rout, Zane Gilmour, Carl Cereke, and Christopher Sawtell,
We have co-opted David Kirk and Rik Tyndall, because they are 'good keen
fellows'.
Have I missed some thread discussing this?
Yes, very approximately a year or two ago Nick Elder had to stop organising
the CLUG and it fell, by election, to the current incumbents to do the
necessary stuff.
Thanks for clarifying that.
=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================
