Tait's disclaimer. Not mine. Embarrassing, but there's nothing I can do about it. If you think this one's bad, you should have seen the one that (briefly) preceded it.

Thinking about it is too painful. Thanks for the reminder.
Douglas.

Carl Cerecke wrote:
Douglas Royds (well, his disclaimer anyway) wrote:

Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.


That's a new one on me. What if the disclaimer had been corrupted or altered? What if the disclaimer *is* the alteration? Wait a minute...

Think about it.

Cheers,
Carl.


=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================



Reply via email to