As Chris and Matthew have asked me the same question pretty much, should I only respond to one to pull the thread together as I have here, or both? What is list etiquette for such situations?
Matthew Gregan wrote:


At 2004-11-12T11:54:53+1300, Andy Leach wrote:


OKAY!!! it dialed, I got a connection, I heard the modem doing its thing. All 3 packets went and came back safely without loss in 278ms, 279ms and 278ms



Good news.



the kinternet connection has now got two plugs, however, ping www.google.com gives the same name failure problem as does ftp



Okay, that explains the RFC1918 address you start off with after starting KInternet--since you're using dial-on-demand, you need some valid and unique address for the ppp0 device. Once traffic passes across that connection, the dial up is triggered.

(I don't use dial-on-demand, so I haven't seen this before.)



I'm saying that i get a kinternet log of





SuSE Meta pppd ( smpppd-ifcfg), Version 1.16 on linux


[...]


Status is: lurking
pppd[0]: local IP address 192.168.99.1
pppd[0]: remote IP address 192.168.99.99
regardless of whether th modem is plugged in or not, yes. with the connection in place now the next lines added are



Right. That makes sense given the use of dial-on-demand.



pppd[0]: starting link
Establishing connection due to activity



If you run the following after this point, you should find that ppp0 has a public IP address:

# ifconfig ppp0



it gives me
link encap: Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr: 202.150.99.252 P-t-P: 192.168.251.74 Mask 255.255.255.255
UP POINTTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MUTLICAST MTU: 1500 Metric: 1
RX packets: 6 errors: 1 dropped: 0 overruns: 0 frame: 0
TX packets: 9 errors: 0 dropped: 2 overruns: 0 frame: 0
collisions: 0 txqueuelen: 3
RX bytes: 186 (180.0 b) TX bytes: 351 (351.0 b)


ifconfig also gave me entries for eth0 and lo I assumed the details weren't required here.



it then goes on with various line of initialization, authentication
etc. all of which seems to have been succesful - is the full log
entry required here?





hopefully this gives a new pointer to what exactly i did here...
thanks



Well, we've come somewhat full circle. Can you tell us where you're
seeing the "/etc/resolv.conf does not exist" error you mentioned in your
first post about this problem?


bugger, I don't remember where it was - can I re-'touch' the file to bring the error back?

That file is supposed to contain details
of your ISPs DNS servers; without those details, domain name lookups
(e.g. trying to find out the IP address of www.google.com) will fail.

For a standard pppd(8), specifying 'usepeerdns' in your /etc/ppp/options
file is the usual way to get pppd(8) to store the ISP-supplied DNS
details into /etc/resolv.conf.  There should be an easier way to ensure
this happens via SuSE's graphical configuration utilities, though.  I'm
not familiar with SuSE dial-up stuff, so perhaps Volker can fill in the
details.

Cheers,
-mjg





Reply via email to