On Wednesday 12 October 2005 13:51, Wesley Parish wrote: > Quoting Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wednesday 12 October 2005 12:01, Wesley Parish wrote: > > > Quoting Ross Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Top talk Wesley. > > > > > > > > Your presentation has enticed me to try it myself. > > > > > > > > Cheers Ross Drummond > > > > > > Thanks. I enjoyed giving it and dealing with the feedback. > > > > > > AFAIK, MS Win9x and kqemu don't mix particularly well, which is why I > > > haven't bothered - but I don't doubt Fabrice will get onto that > > > > problem > > > > > sooner or later. > > > > > > Share and Enjoy! > > > > Quick questions: > > Quick answers. Is it okay if I forward these on to the qemu-developers' > list? > > > 1) Is qemu supposed to take 98% - 99% of cpu even while it's supposedly > > quiesent? ( Without the accellerator ) > > Don't know. there was something on the list a while back about that, but I > don't remember what was said. I'll dig it out. I have fixed that one. See:- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Qemu#Optimizing_Windows_9x_CPU_usage
> > 2) Is there any way of getting at files on the host machine other than > > using a > > server like samba or httpd, or the '-cdrom file.iso' trick.? > > IOW Can one 'mount' a vfat partition in some way? See above url, but I have yet to get a smb connection to work. There is mkore to it than meets the eye. [ ... ] -- CS
