On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:19:38 +1200 Andrew Errington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:02, you wrote: > > > However, seeing as you have your index page forwarding to:- > > > http://www.e2-media.co.nz/flash.html > > > which displays as a plain dark blue motionless background in a > > <snip> > Hmm. I went to www.e2-media.co.nz and ended up at the /noflash.html page. > > Of course, since the site *REQUIRES* Flash I don't know anything more about > the company. Fortunately I am not a customer. > > A Well, I don't use the only standards compliant browser out there, but it works fine in firefox. Mind you, it does take a bit of dedication to get that many html errors in so few lines of html (: As with many people on this list, technically I abhor flash, with the devil macromedia loading loads of stuff on my computer without my consent. Unfortunately, providing a technically perfect solution rarely makes a decent living wage, let alone enough to retire on. This site looks good, works ( well, I'd like my scroll wheel to actually scroll text! ), and is eye catching in it's simplicity. If they use similat technology, then their core product has the potential to work on websites, handhelds, phones, and still look good. For a mobile product like this, it's sort of important. I've worked on a number of occasions with similar companies, and always had a blast! 'cept that damn drum 'n bass. Steve
