Robert Fisher wrote:
On Friday 02 June 2006 11:29 pm, Rik Tindall wrote:
But unlike another's tonight, yours merits reply.
Well I suppose you are referring to my post earlier.
Why does it not merit a reply?
I am completely sober but still do not understand the paragraph questioned.
Maybe I am not clever enough?
Rob
Yeah, sorry Rob. I wasn't trying to be obtuse / unreadable.
The short answer is, being at the meeting is the surest way of knowing
what transpires / happens there. For me, it's hard to know which is the
more polite - to report back on a meeting that was advertised on the
list, or not to because only a minority display interest in it.
Obviously this recent effort at reporting fell short, viz the former option.
Up late after a hard week isn't the time where patience exists either.
So I will answer what hasn't been (answered), further up the appropriate
thread, now.
Cheers, & hth,
--
Rik
