On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:02:18PM +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:54:01 +0100 Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:31:00PM +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote: > > > No, but I find the openvpn extension very useful, even if it won't > > > connect networks. > > > > Can't you? Must admit that I've never tried, but assumed that Ethernet > > bridging would go some way to addressing this, if ip_forward on a > > central routing OpenVPN box didn't ... more info would be interesting. > > > > -jim > tbh, there's mention of this in the readme file, so I never tried as I > haven't delved deeply into the way ipcop and its extensions interact. There > aren't many differences in the two configs > > With OpenVPN it's no problem, but I'm sure you know that. There aren't many > differences in the two configs so extending ipcop *shouldn't* be that > difficult.
Oh, I read your email to say that you couldn't connect networks with OpenVPN :-) A misunderstanding then. -jim
