Yes, I would have thought so, but at the same time there are users here
who don't mind attachments at all.
Nick made a posting last night with a very valid attachment, which for
some would still have been more than they want (him included as he's
standing on principle, not system impact).
Cheers Don
David Mann wrote:
On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Rik Tindall wrote:
You have to draw the line somewhere. 3-K? 5-K? Why not just save us
all the brainache, just for once, and stick with Usenix-like
convention - 0-K of attachments are what treats most people nicest.
It'd be easier to set the list server to strip out all attachments. No
policing required.
- Dave
--
Don Gould
www.thinkdesignprint.co.nz - www.tcn.bowenvale.co.nz -
www.bowenvale.co.nz - SkypeMe: ThinkDesignPrint
begin:vcard
fn:Don Gould
n:Gould;Don
org:Bowenvale Communications
adr:Riccarton;;2/59 Peverel Street;Christchurch;;8004;New Zealand
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Director
tel;work:+64 3 348 7235
tel;home:+64 3 348 7235
tel;cell:+64 21 114 0699
url:http://www.bowenvale.co.nz
version:2.1
end:vcard
